The hole in this case relies on a combination of how Slack uses email addresses and its lack of a true bulk delete option for member messages. Slack has strong privacy protections, even among members of a team and the owner of the team. While I don’t believe this design is intentional, it undermines some of Slack’s statements about user privacy. But there is a gap through which access can slip. That would be fine if the member were the only person who could reactivate the account. Instead the company deactivates them, which isn’t the same thing. Slack doesn’t let users delete their accounts. My understanding was that her public messages would persist, thus not violating any employment agreement or making older public conversations incomprehensible, while no one would ever have access to her non-public communications. 1646: Security-focused OS updates, Photos Workbench review, Mastodon client wishlist, Apple-related conferencesĪ colleague recently left a job, and I suggested that, as part of her purge of personal data associated with her work accounts, she delete her Slack account in order to destroy personal messages sent through direct messages (what Slack often refers to as “conversations”) or in private channels.1647: Focus-caused notification issues, site-specific browser examples, virtualizing Windows on M-series Macs.#1648: iPhone passcode thefts, Center Cam improves webcam eye contact, APFS Uncertainty Principle.#1649: More LastPass breach details and 1Password switch, macOS screen saver problem, tvOS 16.3.3 fixes Siri Remote bug.#1650: Cloud storage changes for Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive quirky printing problem.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |